<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 1332 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389083</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) to reject the appeal filed with a delay of 490 days, emphasizing the importance of complying with statutory timelines for filing appeals and the limited authority of appellate bodies to condone delays as per the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Nov 2019 12:50:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=595803" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 1332 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389083</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) to reject the appeal filed with a delay of 490 days, emphasizing the importance of complying with statutory timelines for filing appeals and the limited authority of appellate bodies to condone delays as per the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389083</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>