<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (4) TMI 43 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20580</link>
    <description>The court declined the petitioner&#039;s request to challenge the pre-emptive purchase order after accepting a refund and recognizing the respondent as the landlord. The court remanded the eviction order matter for the petitioner to file objections and be heard, distinguishing between the challenges to the pre-emptive purchase and eviction orders. The petitioner was directed to appear before the authority on a specified date for further proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 17:30:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=59579" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (4) TMI 43 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20580</link>
      <description>The court declined the petitioner&#039;s request to challenge the pre-emptive purchase order after accepting a refund and recognizing the respondent as the landlord. The court remanded the eviction order matter for the petitioner to file objections and be heard, distinguishing between the challenges to the pre-emptive purchase and eviction orders. The petitioner was directed to appear before the authority on a specified date for further proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20580</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>