<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1917 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284623</link>
    <description>The appeal was found to be filed within the prescribed limitation period for challenging the order of the first appellate authority, so the time-bar objection did not apply. On that basis, the Tribunal admitted the appeal and directed the Registry to list it for disposal in due course. No other substantive issue was decided.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2019 18:00:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=595788" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1917 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284623</link>
      <description>The appeal was found to be filed within the prescribed limitation period for challenging the order of the first appellate authority, so the time-bar objection did not apply. On that basis, the Tribunal admitted the appeal and directed the Registry to list it for disposal in due course. No other substantive issue was decided.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284623</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>