<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 1103 - ITAT CHENNAI  </title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284621</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chennai allowed cross appeals filed by both the Revenue and the assessee, setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s orders. The Tribunal agreed with the Revenue&#039;s argument that additional evidence was improperly admitted without confronting the Assessing Officer, directing the matters to be sent back for re-adjudication. All appeals were allowed for statistical purposes, with the orders pronounced on 05/05/2011.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2019 17:43:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=595783" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 1103 - ITAT CHENNAI  </title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284621</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chennai allowed cross appeals filed by both the Revenue and the assessee, setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s orders. The Tribunal agreed with the Revenue&#039;s argument that additional evidence was improperly admitted without confronting the Assessing Officer, directing the matters to be sent back for re-adjudication. All appeals were allowed for statistical purposes, with the orders pronounced on 05/05/2011.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284621</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>