https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284612 A criminal complaint under cheque dishonour law could not be sustained against a person who had resigned as a director before the cheque was issued, whose resignation had been accepted and intimated to the Registrar of Companies, and who was not the signatory to the cheque. On those facts, she was no longer a director on the relevant date and had no role in the cheque transaction, so the summoning order ignored material facts. The complaint, summoning order, and subsequent proceedings were quashed qua the petitioner. en-us Thu, 24 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 29 Nov 2019 13:52:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284612 A criminal complaint under cheque dishonour law could not be sustained against a person who had resigned as a director before the cheque was issued, whose resignation had been accepted and intimated to the Registrar of Companies, and who was not the signatory to the cheque. On those facts, she was no longer a director on the relevant date and had no role in the cheque transaction, so the summoning order ignored material facts. The complaint, summoning order, and subsequent proceedings were quashed qua the petitioner. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 24 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284612