https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389080 The applicant, seeking an advance ruling on the tax treatment of ENA used in manufacturing homeopathic formulations, was deemed ineligible as they were not presently involved in ENA production and lacked concrete plans or documentation for future operations. The ruling emphasized the requirement for a direct connection between the ruling subject and the applicant's business activities, highlighting the importance of supporting evidence for proposed ventures in advance ruling applications. The absence of a tangible link between the issue and the applicant's current or intended business activities led to the rejection of the application. en-us Wed, 20 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 12 Mar 2025 17:21:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389080 The applicant, seeking an advance ruling on the tax treatment of ENA used in manufacturing homeopathic formulations, was deemed ineligible as they were not presently involved in ENA production and lacked concrete plans or documentation for future operations. The ruling emphasized the requirement for a direct connection between the ruling subject and the applicant's business activities, highlighting the importance of supporting evidence for proposed ventures in advance ruling applications. The absence of a tangible link between the issue and the applicant's current or intended business activities led to the rejection of the application. Case-Laws GST Wed, 20 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389080