<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 1306 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389057</link>
    <description>The court granted an interim stay in a case challenging a notice seeking to reopen assessment for Assessment Year 2013-14 under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The court found that the notice lacked jurisdiction as there was no failure to disclose necessary facts for assessment and appeared to be based on a potential change of opinion. The respondents accepted the interim stay, and the court ruled in favor of the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2019 11:43:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=595723" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 1306 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389057</link>
      <description>The court granted an interim stay in a case challenging a notice seeking to reopen assessment for Assessment Year 2013-14 under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The court found that the notice lacked jurisdiction as there was no failure to disclose necessary facts for assessment and appeared to be based on a potential change of opinion. The respondents accepted the interim stay, and the court ruled in favor of the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389057</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>