<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 1299 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389050</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the penalty proceedings were unsustainable due to the vague and ambiguous notice issued under Section 274 read with Section 271(1)(c). The notice failed to specify the exact charge, violating principles of natural justice. Consequently, the penalty imposed was deleted, and the appeal by the assessee was allowed. The decision emphasized the importance of clear and specific charges in penalty notices to uphold principles of natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2019 11:19:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=595714" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 1299 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389050</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the penalty proceedings were unsustainable due to the vague and ambiguous notice issued under Section 274 read with Section 271(1)(c). The notice failed to specify the exact charge, violating principles of natural justice. Consequently, the penalty imposed was deleted, and the appeal by the assessee was allowed. The decision emphasized the importance of clear and specific charges in penalty notices to uphold principles of natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389050</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>