<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 1283 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389034</link>
    <description>Police remand must be exercised on reasonable grounds and material before the Magistrate, and a refusal must briefly disclose reasons showing due application of mind. A non-speaking or mechanically reasoned order refusing further remand is not in accordance with law. On the facts described, the investigation involved voluminous records, material had to be confronted to the accused, and custodial interrogation was needed for further investigation. The refusal orders were found bereft of sound reasoning and reflecting a casual approach, so the refusal of further police remand was held unsustainable and custody with the Directorate of Enforcement was directed till 28.11.2019.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2019 10:06:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=595688" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 1283 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389034</link>
      <description>Police remand must be exercised on reasonable grounds and material before the Magistrate, and a refusal must briefly disclose reasons showing due application of mind. A non-speaking or mechanically reasoned order refusing further remand is not in accordance with law. On the facts described, the investigation involved voluminous records, material had to be confronted to the accused, and custodial interrogation was needed for further investigation. The refusal orders were found bereft of sound reasoning and reflecting a casual approach, so the refusal of further police remand was held unsustainable and custody with the Directorate of Enforcement was directed till 28.11.2019.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389034</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>