<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 1278 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389029</link>
    <description>Delay in filing an appeal may be condoned where the order was not directly served on the assessee and the explanation shows sufficient cause, including circumstances such as service on a tax consultant rather than an authorised representative and illness affecting the handling of the matter. The appeal was filed within one year of the assessee receiving the order, and the appellate authority was expected to examine condonation on those facts. In these peculiar circumstances, the delay was treated as adequately explained, while the assessee could still be put to terms for lack of diligence, and the appeal was to be heard on merits if the imposed conditions were satisfied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2019 10:03:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=595678" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 1278 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389029</link>
      <description>Delay in filing an appeal may be condoned where the order was not directly served on the assessee and the explanation shows sufficient cause, including circumstances such as service on a tax consultant rather than an authorised representative and illness affecting the handling of the matter. The appeal was filed within one year of the assessee receiving the order, and the appellate authority was expected to examine condonation on those facts. In these peculiar circumstances, the delay was treated as adequately explained, while the assessee could still be put to terms for lack of diligence, and the appeal was to be heard on merits if the imposed conditions were satisfied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389029</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>