https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389024 The Kerala High Court upheld the Ext.P3 conditional stay order requiring the petitioner to pay 20% of the disputed amount during the appeal process under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003. Despite referencing a previous case, the Court found the first appellate authority's decision to impose the condition valid due to the absence of the authorized representative during the stay petition hearing. The challenge against the order failed, and the writ petition was dismissed, with the exception of granting the petitioner additional time to comply with the payment condition. en-us Tue, 19 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 29 Nov 2019 10:03:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389024 The Kerala High Court upheld the Ext.P3 conditional stay order requiring the petitioner to pay 20% of the disputed amount during the appeal process under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003. Despite referencing a previous case, the Court found the first appellate authority's decision to impose the condition valid due to the absence of the authorized representative during the stay petition hearing. The challenge against the order failed, and the writ petition was dismissed, with the exception of granting the petitioner additional time to comply with the payment condition. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 19 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389024