<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 1271 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389022</link>
    <description>The court granted condonation of delay in filing the appeal and addressed the jurisdictional issue of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT). Referring to a previous court decision, the court set aside the impugned order and remitted the matter back to CESTAT for a fresh examination, emphasizing that its decision does not reflect on the case&#039;s merits. The court directed CESTAT to hear both parties on the merits and jurisdiction separately, with findings on jurisdiction subject to the final outcome in the Supreme Court. The appeal was partly allowed, stressing the need for a fresh examination by CESTAT while considering the jurisdictional issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Nov 2019 10:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=595670" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 1271 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389022</link>
      <description>The court granted condonation of delay in filing the appeal and addressed the jurisdictional issue of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT). Referring to a previous court decision, the court set aside the impugned order and remitted the matter back to CESTAT for a fresh examination, emphasizing that its decision does not reflect on the case&#039;s merits. The court directed CESTAT to hear both parties on the merits and jurisdiction separately, with findings on jurisdiction subject to the final outcome in the Supreme Court. The appeal was partly allowed, stressing the need for a fresh examination by CESTAT while considering the jurisdictional issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389022</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>