<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 1270 - CHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389021</link>
    <description>The appeal challenging the dismissal for delay under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was ultimately dismissed. The appellant, a Public Sector Company, failed to provide a satisfactory explanation for the delay in filing the appeal, which was attributed to office shifting and employee transfers. The Tribunal upheld the dismissal based on the delay, citing legal precedents emphasizing the importance of adhering to statutory timelines. The Court found no grounds to interfere with the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ultimately upholding the dismissal of the appellant&#039;s appeal due to the delay and the insufficient explanation provided.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Nov 2019 10:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=595668" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 1270 - CHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389021</link>
      <description>The appeal challenging the dismissal for delay under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was ultimately dismissed. The appellant, a Public Sector Company, failed to provide a satisfactory explanation for the delay in filing the appeal, which was attributed to office shifting and employee transfers. The Tribunal upheld the dismissal based on the delay, citing legal precedents emphasizing the importance of adhering to statutory timelines. The Court found no grounds to interfere with the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ultimately upholding the dismissal of the appellant&#039;s appeal due to the delay and the insufficient explanation provided.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389021</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>