<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (6) TMI 49 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20567</link>
    <description>The reference could not be answered on the basis of the statement of the case as filed because the enclosure to the reference application was essential for proper disposal. The statement of the case was therefore treated as incomplete, and the Tribunal was directed to submit a supplementary statement of the case together with the enclosure so that the reference could be properly decided.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 17:03:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=59566" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (6) TMI 49 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20567</link>
      <description>The reference could not be answered on the basis of the statement of the case as filed because the enclosure to the reference application was essential for proper disposal. The statement of the case was therefore treated as incomplete, and the Tribunal was directed to submit a supplementary statement of the case together with the enclosure so that the reference could be properly decided.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20567</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>