<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 1675 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284601</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the order granting interest on a pre-deposit refund under Section 35FF of the Central Excise Act, 1944. It ruled that interest is payable if the refund is not granted within three months from the communication of the order by the Appellate Authority, regardless of when the deposit was made. The tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming that interest applies to refunds falling under Section 35FF. Judgment was pronounced on 26-6-2018.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2019 17:34:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=595641" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 1675 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284601</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the order granting interest on a pre-deposit refund under Section 35FF of the Central Excise Act, 1944. It ruled that interest is payable if the refund is not granted within three months from the communication of the order by the Appellate Authority, regardless of when the deposit was made. The tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming that interest applies to refunds falling under Section 35FF. Judgment was pronounced on 26-6-2018.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284601</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>