<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 1256 - APPELLATE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, WEST BENGAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389007</link>
    <description>The Appellate Authority upheld the ruling of the WBAAR, classifying the supply as a works contract for site preparation. The Appellant&#039;s arguments regarding the nature of the job, classification as a composite supply, and the status of the principal contractor as a government entity were not accepted. The appeal was dismissed, and the original ruling was maintained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2020 15:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=595628" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 1256 - APPELLATE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, WEST BENGAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389007</link>
      <description>The Appellate Authority upheld the ruling of the WBAAR, classifying the supply as a works contract for site preparation. The Appellant&#039;s arguments regarding the nature of the job, classification as a composite supply, and the status of the principal contractor as a government entity were not accepted. The appeal was dismissed, and the original ruling was maintained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389007</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>