https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389003 The court noted the absence of a counter affidavit from the respondents, leading to the closure of their right to file one. The petitioner sought relief under Article 226 due to technical glitches preventing the filing of tax credit claims, despite efforts and reminders. The court, relying on past decisions, allowed the petition, directing the respondents to facilitate the filing of the form and process the claim in compliance with the law within a specified deadline. en-us Fri, 22 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 28 Nov 2019 14:23:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389003 The court noted the absence of a counter affidavit from the respondents, leading to the closure of their right to file one. The petitioner sought relief under Article 226 due to technical glitches preventing the filing of tax credit claims, despite efforts and reminders. The court, relying on past decisions, allowed the petition, directing the respondents to facilitate the filing of the form and process the claim in compliance with the law within a specified deadline. Case-Laws GST Fri, 22 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389003