https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388998 The court closed the respondents' right to file a counter affidavit after they failed to do so. The petitioner sought relief under Article 226, including credit of eligible duties under the CGST Act. Technical glitches prevented the petitioner from filing Form GST TRAN-1 despite efforts and extensions. Citing precedents, the court directed the respondents to facilitate filing the form electronically or manually by a specified date and process the petitioner's claim accordingly. en-us Thu, 21 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 28 Nov 2019 14:22:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388998 The court closed the respondents' right to file a counter affidavit after they failed to do so. The petitioner sought relief under Article 226, including credit of eligible duties under the CGST Act. Technical glitches prevented the petitioner from filing Form GST TRAN-1 despite efforts and extensions. Citing precedents, the court directed the respondents to facilitate filing the form electronically or manually by a specified date and process the petitioner's claim accordingly. Case-Laws GST Thu, 21 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388998