https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388997 The court dismissed the Public Interest Litigation (PIL) due to lack of maintainability and bona fides, imposing a cost of Rs. 5,000 on the petitioner. It held that the notification dated 30.09.2019 could not be applied retrospectively and upheld the refund orders dated 04.10.2019. The judgment stressed the significance of genuine public interest in PILs and warned against their misuse for personal or vested interests. en-us Mon, 18 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Oct 2020 11:57:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388997 The court dismissed the Public Interest Litigation (PIL) due to lack of maintainability and bona fides, imposing a cost of Rs. 5,000 on the petitioner. It held that the notification dated 30.09.2019 could not be applied retrospectively and upheld the refund orders dated 04.10.2019. The judgment stressed the significance of genuine public interest in PILs and warned against their misuse for personal or vested interests. Case-Laws GST Mon, 18 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388997