<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 1226 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388977</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, condoning the delay in filing the appeal before CIT(A) due to unintentional delay caused by the Chartered Accountant misplacing appeal papers. The Tribunal also deleted the addition of &#039;un-disclosed income&#039; based on the admission of income in regular returns, citing legal precedents supporting condonation of delay and avoiding double taxation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2019 12:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=595577" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 1226 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388977</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, condoning the delay in filing the appeal before CIT(A) due to unintentional delay caused by the Chartered Accountant misplacing appeal papers. The Tribunal also deleted the addition of &#039;un-disclosed income&#039; based on the admission of income in regular returns, citing legal precedents supporting condonation of delay and avoiding double taxation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388977</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>