https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388960 The appeal filed by a petitioner against a service tax demand was dismissed due to a delay in filing. The petitioner had paid the tax demand, interest, and 25% of the penalty but disputed the remaining 75% penalty. Seeking to benefit from an amnesty scheme, the petitioner's counsel requested to withdraw the writ petition, which was granted by the court with liberty. This case emphasizes the significance of timely appeals in tax matters and the opportunity for taxpayers to resolve disputes through amnesty schemes effectively. en-us Mon, 25 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 28 Nov 2019 11:07:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388960 The appeal filed by a petitioner against a service tax demand was dismissed due to a delay in filing. The petitioner had paid the tax demand, interest, and 25% of the penalty but disputed the remaining 75% penalty. Seeking to benefit from an amnesty scheme, the petitioner's counsel requested to withdraw the writ petition, which was granted by the court with liberty. This case emphasizes the significance of timely appeals in tax matters and the opportunity for taxpayers to resolve disputes through amnesty schemes effectively. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 25 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388960