https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388954 The High Court of Punjab & Haryana allowed the appellant to withdraw the appeal based on the monetary limits set by CBIC, as the duty amount fell below the prescribed threshold. This decision concluded the case involving the rejection of CENVAT Credit, interpretation of electricity transactions, correctness of CESTAT's order, and compliance with monetary guidelines for appeal withdrawal. The judgment highlighted the intricate nature of excise duty issues and the significance of adhering to legal provisions and precedents in resolving disputes. en-us Wed, 20 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 28 Nov 2019 10:50:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388954 The High Court of Punjab & Haryana allowed the appellant to withdraw the appeal based on the monetary limits set by CBIC, as the duty amount fell below the prescribed threshold. This decision concluded the case involving the rejection of CENVAT Credit, interpretation of electricity transactions, correctness of CESTAT's order, and compliance with monetary guidelines for appeal withdrawal. The judgment highlighted the intricate nature of excise duty issues and the significance of adhering to legal provisions and precedents in resolving disputes. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 20 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388954