<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 1203 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388954</link>
    <description>Revenue&#039;s Central Excise appeal concerning CENVAT credit on inputs used for electricity generated and cleared to the grid was not decided on merits. The appellant sought withdrawal after stating that CBIC instructions dated 22.8.2019 prescribed a monetary limit of Rs. 1 crore for filing and prosecuting appeals in the High Court, while the duty involved was below that limit. The application for withdrawal was allowed, and the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2019 10:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=595539" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 1203 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388954</link>
      <description>Revenue&#039;s Central Excise appeal concerning CENVAT credit on inputs used for electricity generated and cleared to the grid was not decided on merits. The appellant sought withdrawal after stating that CBIC instructions dated 22.8.2019 prescribed a monetary limit of Rs. 1 crore for filing and prosecuting appeals in the High Court, while the duty involved was below that limit. The application for withdrawal was allowed, and the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388954</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>