https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388952 The court admitted the appeal for further hearing based on the arguments presented by both counsels. The respondent's collection of excise duty on exempted goods and the application of section 11D were key points of contention. The court's decision to allow the appeal to proceed indicated the complexity and significance of the legal issues involved, particularly regarding the interpretation of relevant laws and the application of precedent in similar cases. en-us Wed, 13 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 28 Nov 2019 10:43:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388952 The court admitted the appeal for further hearing based on the arguments presented by both counsels. The respondent's collection of excise duty on exempted goods and the application of section 11D were key points of contention. The court's decision to allow the appeal to proceed indicated the complexity and significance of the legal issues involved, particularly regarding the interpretation of relevant laws and the application of precedent in similar cases. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 13 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388952