<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 1538 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284596</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the Applicant&#039;s application to condone a 468-day delay in filing a cross-objection, citing inadequate explanation for the delay despite financial difficulties. Consequently, the cross-objection was dismissed, and the appeal was set for a final hearing on 12 September 2019.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2019 10:20:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=595528" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 1538 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284596</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the Applicant&#039;s application to condone a 468-day delay in filing a cross-objection, citing inadequate explanation for the delay despite financial difficulties. Consequently, the cross-objection was dismissed, and the appeal was set for a final hearing on 12 September 2019.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284596</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>