https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284588 The court upheld the competence of the Reference Order under Section 4-K of the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, dismissed the binding nature of the settlement agreement, and affirmed that principles of natural justice did not mandate a hearing before the reference. It also confirmed the existence of an industrial dispute, justifying the government's decision. The petitioner's arguments were deemed meritless, and interim orders were vacated. The court commended the counsel's argument presentation. en-us Thu, 07 May 1981 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 27 Nov 2019 18:35:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284588 The court upheld the competence of the Reference Order under Section 4-K of the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, dismissed the binding nature of the settlement agreement, and affirmed that principles of natural justice did not mandate a hearing before the reference. It also confirmed the existence of an industrial dispute, justifying the government's decision. The petitioner's arguments were deemed meritless, and interim orders were vacated. The court commended the counsel's argument presentation. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 07 May 1981 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284588