<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 1195 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388946</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the tribunal&#039;s decision to quash the CIT&#039;s order under Section 263, finding it time-barred and ruling that the premium paid for the Accountants Risk Policy did not qualify for deduction under the Income Tax Act. The court dismissed the appeal, favoring the assessee over the revenue, rendering the other issues moot.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2019 14:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=595495" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 1195 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388946</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the tribunal&#039;s decision to quash the CIT&#039;s order under Section 263, finding it time-barred and ruling that the premium paid for the Accountants Risk Policy did not qualify for deduction under the Income Tax Act. The court dismissed the appeal, favoring the assessee over the revenue, rendering the other issues moot.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388946</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>