<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 1185 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388936</link>
    <description>The tribunal partially allowed the appeal by reducing the disallowance of business promotion expenses to Rs. 1,00,000. It directed the Assessing Officer to re-compute the disallowance of section 80P(2)(a)(i) deduction on a netting basis, considering interest income earned from investments. The tribunal emphasized that the interest income derived from investments is not eligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) and specified a timeframe for the re-computation process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2019 13:39:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=595482" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 1185 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388936</link>
      <description>The tribunal partially allowed the appeal by reducing the disallowance of business promotion expenses to Rs. 1,00,000. It directed the Assessing Officer to re-compute the disallowance of section 80P(2)(a)(i) deduction on a netting basis, considering interest income earned from investments. The tribunal emphasized that the interest income derived from investments is not eligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) and specified a timeframe for the re-computation process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388936</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>