<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (3) TMI 10 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20548</link>
    <description>The High Court determined that the case constituted a succession under section 188 of the Income-tax Act, rather than a continuation of the firm under section 187. Relying on precedents, the court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision for separate assessments due to changes in the firm&#039;s constitution following a partner&#039;s death and the execution of new partnership deeds. The court ruled in favor of the assessee, affirming the application of section 188 and directing separate assessments for the relevant periods, with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 16:10:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=59547" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (3) TMI 10 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20548</link>
      <description>The High Court determined that the case constituted a succession under section 188 of the Income-tax Act, rather than a continuation of the firm under section 187. Relying on precedents, the court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision for separate assessments due to changes in the firm&#039;s constitution following a partner&#039;s death and the execution of new partnership deeds. The court ruled in favor of the assessee, affirming the application of section 188 and directing separate assessments for the relevant periods, with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20548</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>