<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 1172 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388923</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court declined to interfere and dismissed the special leave petition, leaving the impugned matter undisturbed in these proceedings. The petitioners were granted liberty to urge all legal and factual contentions before the appropriate authority, preserving their right to seek relief in the competent forum. The Court also made clear that it expressed no view on the limitation issue, which remains open and must be decided on its own merits by the appropriate authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2019 12:11:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=595462" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 1172 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388923</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court declined to interfere and dismissed the special leave petition, leaving the impugned matter undisturbed in these proceedings. The petitioners were granted liberty to urge all legal and factual contentions before the appropriate authority, preserving their right to seek relief in the competent forum. The Court also made clear that it expressed no view on the limitation issue, which remains open and must be decided on its own merits by the appropriate authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388923</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>