<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 1158 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388909</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petition in part, setting aside the impugned order only in respect of sales against Form-C and corresponding penalty. The matter was remitted back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration within four weeks, with the petitioner given an opportunity to be heard. No costs were awarded, and the connected miscellaneous petition was closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2019 10:59:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=595441" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 1158 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388909</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petition in part, setting aside the impugned order only in respect of sales against Form-C and corresponding penalty. The matter was remitted back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration within four weeks, with the petitioner given an opportunity to be heard. No costs were awarded, and the connected miscellaneous petition was closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388909</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>