<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (11) TMI 22 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20544</link>
    <description>The High Court of Calcutta held that the reimbursement made to employees for motor car expenses used in business operations fell within the scope of &quot;expenditure on running and maintenance of motor cars&quot; under section 37(3B) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Consequently, the court ruled in favor of the Revenue, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the reimbursement was not allowable under section 37(3A)/(3B).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 15:59:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=59543" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (11) TMI 22 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20544</link>
      <description>The High Court of Calcutta held that the reimbursement made to employees for motor car expenses used in business operations fell within the scope of &quot;expenditure on running and maintenance of motor cars&quot; under section 37(3B) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Consequently, the court ruled in favor of the Revenue, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the reimbursement was not allowable under section 37(3A)/(3B).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20544</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>