<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (6) TMI 46 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20542</link>
    <description>Stamp duty, adjudication fee and registration charges paid for lease deeds executed by the Government in favour of the assessee for plantation lands were held to be revenue expenditure. Applying the pragmatic test, the Court treated the true inquiry as whether the outlay facilitated the business operations or secured an asset or right of permanent character. Because the lease arrangements only enabled the carrying on of the plantation business and formed part of the profit-earning process, they did not create fixed capital, and the long duration of the leases was not ative. The expenditure was therefore allowable as a deduction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 15:55:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=59541" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (6) TMI 46 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20542</link>
      <description>Stamp duty, adjudication fee and registration charges paid for lease deeds executed by the Government in favour of the assessee for plantation lands were held to be revenue expenditure. Applying the pragmatic test, the Court treated the true inquiry as whether the outlay facilitated the business operations or secured an asset or right of permanent character. Because the lease arrangements only enabled the carrying on of the plantation business and formed part of the profit-earning process, they did not create fixed capital, and the long duration of the leases was not ative. The expenditure was therefore allowable as a deduction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20542</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>