https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284571 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the Madhya Pradesh High Court's judgment in a case involving a Branch Manager at State Bank of India facing disciplinary action. The Court rejected the grounds of non-supply of Enquiry Officer's report and the requirement for a fresh notice upon disagreement by the appellate authority. It held that the disciplinary authority can independently assess charges and affirmed that a speaking order by the appellate authority is not mandatory in cases of affirmation, as long as the order demonstrates consideration of case facts and grounds of appeal. en-us Wed, 12 Jan 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 26 Nov 2019 18:04:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284571 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the Madhya Pradesh High Court's judgment in a case involving a Branch Manager at State Bank of India facing disciplinary action. The Court rejected the grounds of non-supply of Enquiry Officer's report and the requirement for a fresh notice upon disagreement by the appellate authority. It held that the disciplinary authority can independently assess charges and affirmed that a speaking order by the appellate authority is not mandatory in cases of affirmation, as long as the order demonstrates consideration of case facts and grounds of appeal. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 12 Jan 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284571