<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (3) TMI 42 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20541</link>
    <description>The court upheld the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, in favor of the Revenue. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to confirm the penalty was deemed reasonable due to significant income discrepancies, lack of satisfactory explanation by the assessee, and findings of deliberate concealment. The court found the burden of proof was not discharged by the assessee, leading to the penalty being sustained without costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 15:53:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=59540" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (3) TMI 42 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20541</link>
      <description>The court upheld the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, in favor of the Revenue. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to confirm the penalty was deemed reasonable due to significant income discrepancies, lack of satisfactory explanation by the assessee, and findings of deliberate concealment. The court found the burden of proof was not discharged by the assessee, leading to the penalty being sustained without costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20541</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>