<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (3) TMI 40 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20539</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee on the primary issues, determining that the receipt of Rs. 24.92 lakhs was not considered capital gains and that the cost of plant and machinery should not be reduced by this amount. However, the Court ruled in favor of the Revenue on the issue of the applicability of sections 33 and 43(1) versus sections 43A(1) and (2), based on a Supreme Court precedent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 15:47:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=59538" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (3) TMI 40 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20539</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee on the primary issues, determining that the receipt of Rs. 24.92 lakhs was not considered capital gains and that the cost of plant and machinery should not be reduced by this amount. However, the Court ruled in favor of the Revenue on the issue of the applicability of sections 33 and 43(1) versus sections 43A(1) and (2), based on a Supreme Court precedent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20539</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>