<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1789 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284549</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the reopening of the assessment under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act was invalid due to the Assessing Officer&#039;s lack of application of mind to the information received, which included duplicate entries. Additionally, the Additional Commissioner of Income Tax granted approval under Section 151(1) mechanically without proper verification. Consequently, the Tribunal quashed the reopening of the assessment as bad in law and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2019 19:28:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=595320" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1789 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284549</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the reopening of the assessment under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act was invalid due to the Assessing Officer&#039;s lack of application of mind to the information received, which included duplicate entries. Additionally, the Additional Commissioner of Income Tax granted approval under Section 151(1) mechanically without proper verification. Consequently, the Tribunal quashed the reopening of the assessment as bad in law and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284549</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>