<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (3) TMI 35 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20530</link>
    <description>The court held that an appeal against a rectification order under section 154 is competent under section 246(f), as it is part of the assessment process. The original order of assessment can be rectified under section 154 even if interest liability under section 215 is automatic. The Income-tax Officer is not obliged to consider reducing or waiving interest at the time of assessment. The court clarified that the Officer can exercise discretion without the assessee&#039;s application. Failure to pass an order for levying interest may imply a waiver. The decisions favored the assessee on issues 1 and 2 but favored the Revenue on issue 3.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 15:28:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=59529" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (3) TMI 35 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20530</link>
      <description>The court held that an appeal against a rectification order under section 154 is competent under section 246(f), as it is part of the assessment process. The original order of assessment can be rectified under section 154 even if interest liability under section 215 is automatic. The Income-tax Officer is not obliged to consider reducing or waiving interest at the time of assessment. The court clarified that the Officer can exercise discretion without the assessee&#039;s application. Failure to pass an order for levying interest may imply a waiver. The decisions favored the assessee on issues 1 and 2 but favored the Revenue on issue 3.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20530</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>