<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 1118 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388869</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the High Court&#039;s decision. It held that an appeal under Section 246A would be maintainable against the determination of liability under Section 115QA and that the High Court was justified in refusing to entertain the writ petition due to the availability of an alternative remedy. The Court directed that the appeal filed by the appellant on 30.08.2019 should proceed in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2019 17:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=595276" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 1118 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388869</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the High Court&#039;s decision. It held that an appeal under Section 246A would be maintainable against the determination of liability under Section 115QA and that the High Court was justified in refusing to entertain the writ petition due to the availability of an alternative remedy. The Court directed that the appeal filed by the appellant on 30.08.2019 should proceed in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388869</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>