<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 1117 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388868</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the deletion of additions related to alleged under-valuation of closing work-in-progress and undisclosed closing stock, finding the assessee&#039;s accounting method correct. However, the Tribunal reversed the addition of Rs. 27,50,748 for profit from unsold flats, stating profit should be recognized upon actual sale. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2019 11:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=595275" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 1117 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388868</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the deletion of additions related to alleged under-valuation of closing work-in-progress and undisclosed closing stock, finding the assessee&#039;s accounting method correct. However, the Tribunal reversed the addition of Rs. 27,50,748 for profit from unsold flats, stating profit should be recognized upon actual sale. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388868</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>