https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388860 The Court restrained the appointment of Goods and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) members until the next date, later extending the interim order. The Madras High Court invalidated certain provisions of the GST Act, suggesting amendments to include Lawyers as Judicial Members in GSTAT. The Supreme Court's Constitution Bench judgment in Rojer Mathew case addressed rationalizing Tribunal administration, conditions of service, and the need for a Single Nodal Agency for Tribunals. The Supreme Court's decision on Tribunal administration would impact the challenge against CGST Act provisions, mandating compliance by the respondents, who were directed to consider amendments based on the Supreme Court's decision. en-us Tue, 19 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 12 Mar 2025 17:35:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388860 The Court restrained the appointment of Goods and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) members until the next date, later extending the interim order. The Madras High Court invalidated certain provisions of the GST Act, suggesting amendments to include Lawyers as Judicial Members in GSTAT. The Supreme Court's Constitution Bench judgment in Rojer Mathew case addressed rationalizing Tribunal administration, conditions of service, and the need for a Single Nodal Agency for Tribunals. The Supreme Court's decision on Tribunal administration would impact the challenge against CGST Act provisions, mandating compliance by the respondents, who were directed to consider amendments based on the Supreme Court's decision. Case-Laws GST Tue, 19 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388860