<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 1104 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388855</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, quashing the revision order under Section 263 of the Income-tax Act. It held that the Assessing Officer had conducted sufficient enquiries regarding sundry creditors, and the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax failed to demonstrate any errors in the assessment. The Tribunal found the revision order lacked jurisdiction and was therefore unjustified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2019 10:30:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=595253" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 1104 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388855</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, quashing the revision order under Section 263 of the Income-tax Act. It held that the Assessing Officer had conducted sufficient enquiries regarding sundry creditors, and the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax failed to demonstrate any errors in the assessment. The Tribunal found the revision order lacked jurisdiction and was therefore unjustified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388855</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>