<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (1) TMI 23 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20526</link>
    <description>The Tribunal&#039;s decision was upheld for all items except for the expenditure incurred for fabrication of towers in Nepal and Laos, for which the assessee is entitled to weighted deduction under section 35B. The question was answered affirmatively against the assessee for all items except the last one, which was answered negatively against the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 14:09:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=59525" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (1) TMI 23 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20526</link>
      <description>The Tribunal&#039;s decision was upheld for all items except for the expenditure incurred for fabrication of towers in Nepal and Laos, for which the assessee is entitled to weighted deduction under section 35B. The question was answered affirmatively against the assessee for all items except the last one, which was answered negatively against the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20526</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>