<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 1098 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388849</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax lacked jurisdiction to set aside the assessment order for AY 2014-15 under Section 263 as the order was not proven to be erroneous or prejudicial to revenue. The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer had properly verified documents and allowed deductions under Section 80IC. The directive for reassessment was deemed invalid, and the appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed, overturning the Pr. CIT&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2019 10:05:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=595244" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 1098 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388849</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax lacked jurisdiction to set aside the assessment order for AY 2014-15 under Section 263 as the order was not proven to be erroneous or prejudicial to revenue. The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer had properly verified documents and allowed deductions under Section 80IC. The directive for reassessment was deemed invalid, and the appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed, overturning the Pr. CIT&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388849</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>