https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284540 Before cancellation of a kerosene licence, Para 11 of the U. P. Kerosene Control Order, 1962 required the licensee to be given a reasonable opportunity to submit an explanation. The text notes that the writ petition asserted no hearing was afforded before cancellation, and that assertion was not controverted by the State through a counter-affidavit. On that undisputed material, the cancellation order could not be sustained and was set aside. en-us Mon, 30 Mar 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 25 Nov 2019 10:01:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284540 Before cancellation of a kerosene licence, Para 11 of the U. P. Kerosene Control Order, 1962 required the licensee to be given a reasonable opportunity to submit an explanation. The text notes that the writ petition asserted no hearing was afforded before cancellation, and that assertion was not controverted by the State through a counter-affidavit. On that undisputed material, the cancellation order could not be sustained and was set aside. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 30 Mar 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284540