<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 1093 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388844</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the initiation of penalty proceedings under section 271AAB was not valid due to vague and unspecified notices. Consequently, the penalty order under section 271AAB was quashed, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed. The other grounds raised by the assessee were not addressed as they became irrelevant following the quashing of the penalty order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2019 09:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=595237" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 1093 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388844</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the initiation of penalty proceedings under section 271AAB was not valid due to vague and unspecified notices. Consequently, the penalty order under section 271AAB was quashed, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed. The other grounds raised by the assessee were not addressed as they became irrelevant following the quashing of the penalty order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388844</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>