https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388840 The court dismissed the petitioner's application for payment of the pre-deposit amount in installments, citing lack of evidence of financial difficulty and emphasizing the impact of the amendment in Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, which reduced the necessity for waiver applications. The court upheld the validity of the amended section, highlighting its aim to minimize litigation and reduce discretionary powers. Consequently, the court found no grounds to entertain the application and dismissed it. en-us Thu, 14 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 25 Nov 2019 09:31:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388840 The court dismissed the petitioner's application for payment of the pre-deposit amount in installments, citing lack of evidence of financial difficulty and emphasizing the impact of the amendment in Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, which reduced the necessity for waiver applications. The court upheld the validity of the amended section, highlighting its aim to minimize litigation and reduce discretionary powers. Consequently, the court found no grounds to entertain the application and dismissed it. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 14 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388840