https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388839 Preventive detention under COFEPOSA may be sustained even when the detenue is already in judicial custody, provided the detaining authority is aware of the custody, has cogent material showing a realistic possibility of release on bail, and records bona fide satisfaction that detention is necessary to prevent prejudicial activity. Non-placement of an alleged retraction petition of a co-accused does not vitiate the detention if the document is not shown to have been before the authority when satisfaction was formed. The Supreme Court accordingly restored the detention orders and rejected the challenge to the High Court's quashing. en-us Fri, 22 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 23 Dec 2022 11:46:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388839 Preventive detention under COFEPOSA may be sustained even when the detenue is already in judicial custody, provided the detaining authority is aware of the custody, has cogent material showing a realistic possibility of release on bail, and records bona fide satisfaction that detention is necessary to prevent prejudicial activity. Non-placement of an alleged retraction petition of a co-accused does not vitiate the detention if the document is not shown to have been before the authority when satisfaction was formed. The Supreme Court accordingly restored the detention orders and rejected the challenge to the High Court's quashing. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 22 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388839