<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1787 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284532</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the AO to readjudicate the deduction under section 10A in light of the Tata Elxsi judgment. It allowed the club membership fee as revenue expenditure, confirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision. The Tribunal instructed verification of foreign exchange fluctuation inclusion in operating margin of comparables. It upheld the exclusion of certain comparables for Software Development and IT Enabled Services segments, directing a re-computation of the Arm&#039;s Length Price. Assessee&#039;s cross objections were dismissed, and the appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, emphasizing adherence to legal precedents and functional comparability in Transfer Pricing assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2019 09:26:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=595228" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1787 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284532</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the AO to readjudicate the deduction under section 10A in light of the Tata Elxsi judgment. It allowed the club membership fee as revenue expenditure, confirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision. The Tribunal instructed verification of foreign exchange fluctuation inclusion in operating margin of comparables. It upheld the exclusion of certain comparables for Software Development and IT Enabled Services segments, directing a re-computation of the Arm&#039;s Length Price. Assessee&#039;s cross objections were dismissed, and the appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, emphasizing adherence to legal precedents and functional comparability in Transfer Pricing assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284532</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>