https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388833 The Respondent in the case failed to pass on the benefit of additional Input Tax Credit (ITC) to buyers, violating Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017. The profiteered amount was determined to be Rs. 5,30,34,074, and the Respondent was directed to refund/reduce prices for buyers accordingly. Additionally, the Respondent was ordered to pay the profiteered amount to eligible buyers with interest and faced penalties under Section 171 (3A) of the CGST Act, 2017. Monitoring and compliance enforcement were assigned to the Commissioners of CGST/SGST Haryana. en-us Tue, 19 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 12 Mar 2025 17:36:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388833 The Respondent in the case failed to pass on the benefit of additional Input Tax Credit (ITC) to buyers, violating Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017. The profiteered amount was determined to be Rs. 5,30,34,074, and the Respondent was directed to refund/reduce prices for buyers accordingly. Additionally, the Respondent was ordered to pay the profiteered amount to eligible buyers with interest and faced penalties under Section 171 (3A) of the CGST Act, 2017. Monitoring and compliance enforcement were assigned to the Commissioners of CGST/SGST Haryana. Case-Laws GST Tue, 19 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388833