<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 1077 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388828</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s orders, allowing the assessee&#039;s claim for the deduction of 60% of adjusted income while computing the book profit under Section 115JB for both AY 2010-11 and AY 2013-14. The Tribunal found that the common issue involved in these appeals was squarely covered in favor of the assessee by its earlier order dated 03.02.2017. Consequently, the appeals filed by the Revenue were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Nov 2019 11:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=595183" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 1077 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388828</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s orders, allowing the assessee&#039;s claim for the deduction of 60% of adjusted income while computing the book profit under Section 115JB for both AY 2010-11 and AY 2013-14. The Tribunal found that the common issue involved in these appeals was squarely covered in favor of the assessee by its earlier order dated 03.02.2017. Consequently, the appeals filed by the Revenue were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=388828</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>